Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Relax 3.1.1

32 bytes added, 17:41, 12 September 2014
Links to Troels' Gna! page.
* Fix for [https://gna.org/bugs/?21309 bug #21309, the R2eff dispersion model failure when peak intensity data is missing]. The problem was that the check for missing data in the _calculate_r2eff() private API method was accidentally deleted in the relax_disp branch. See the commit at http://article.gmane.org/gmane.science.nmr.relax.scm/19261 and the accidental deletion at http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax/branches/relax_disp/specific_analyses/relax_disp/api.py?view=diff&r1=21504&r2=21505&pathrev=21505.
* Another fix for [https://gna.org/bugs/?21309 bug #21309, the R2eff dispersion model failure when peak intensity data is missing]. This second problem is only for the numeric CPMG models for when all data at one magnetic field strength is missing. When the relaxation dispersion target function is being set up, the creation of the self.power data structure holding the number of CPMG blocks fails. The problem is that the relaxation time for the missing field strength is set to NaN. This is now caught using lib.float.isNaN().
* Loosened a check in the Relax_disp.test_hansen_cpmg_data_missing_auto_analysis system test. This is to allow this test to pass on certain Mac OS X machines. It was reported by [https://gna.org/users/tlinnet Troels ] in the post http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.science.nmr.relax.devel/4773/focus=4774.
* Basic fix for the Relax_disp.test_r2eff_read_spin system test - the CPMG frequencies are now set. This was identified in the post http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.science.nmr.relax.devel/4773/focus=4774.
* Fixes for the parameters in the Relax_disp.test_ns_mmq_3site system test script.
Trusted, Bureaucrats
4,228

edits

Navigation menu